The Ken at ten

04 · The AI question

"Perplexity is killing you." Part of the answer is in The Ken's own robots.txt.

I asked Perplexity six questions on topics The Ken has covered, four of them stories from the past week or two. It cited 65 sources. None was the-ken.com. Fifteen were LinkedIn pages. The Ken's robots.txt blocks the crawlers AI engines use to cite a page, not only the ones that train on it. It also blocks Bing, whose index feeds ChatGPT search.

4.1

The test

Perplexity, logged out, default model, 5 October 2026. One run per question, so this is a snapshot, not a rate. A proper study repeats each question across engines and days. That is what Vedlora, which I built, does.

Questions on The Ken's stories Measured
6
Topics The Ken has covered, four of them in the past week or two
Sources Perplexity cited Measured
65
Unique URLs in the six answers
From the-ken.com Measured
0
Zero citations to The Ken's own pages
LinkedIn pages cited Measured
15
23% of all sources. One was The Ken's own LinkedIn post
Question I askedThe Ken's storyWho Perplexity cited instead
Why did Swiggy launch Toing and how is it affecting Zomato?Swiggy is eating itself to stay in the game · Two by Two, 2 Oct 20265 LinkedIn posts, Moneycontrol ×2, IndianTelevision, Filter Coffee, a Scribd upload
What is Singapore Airlines doing to fix Air India?Air India badly needs saving. Singapore Airlines is playing saviour · Oct 2026Reuters, Business Times ×2, CNA, SCMP, Telegraph, Rediff ×2, two aggregators
Why did Hyperpure and Blinkit separate, and is Hyperpure profitable?Hyperpure rode Blinkit's coattails to the top. Until Blinkit shrugged it offInc42 ×2, Medianama, Fortune India, YourStory, ET, LinkedIn ×4 — including The Ken's own LinkedIn post
Why did Byju's collapse?Five years of coverage from 2017. Byju's left The Ken out when it sent its filings to the pressBusiness Standard, CNBC, ET ×2, TOI, India Today, a Substack, LinkedIn, two blogs
How did TCS start and why does it matter to the Tata group today?The Accidental Crown Jewel: TCS · Intermission, 1 Oct 2026tata.com ×4, tcs.com, Simple Wikipedia, a Google Group, consulting blogs, LinkedIn
Why are fresher salaries in Indian IT so low?The example query Praveen used in his Feb 2026 post on searchThePrint, DQ India, BusinessLine, ET, TOI, Moneycontrol, LinkedIn ×4

How I counted. Unique source URLs in each answer's thread data, excluding images and Perplexity's own links. Two other questions (on Flipkart Minutes and on Yotta's GPU financing) returned no sources and are left out. The raw URL lists are on the sources page.

The highlighted row is the telling one. The Ken does appear in an AI answer, but only through the free LinkedIn post it wrote to promote the story. The story itself is invisible. The AI quotes the trailer and has never seen the film.
4.2

What AI says when someone asks about The Ken

Two questions a potential subscriber might ask before paying.

Question

"Which is the best Indian publication for in-depth business journalism worth paying for?"

Answer: "The Economic Times is widely regarded as India's leading paid business newspaper…"

Sources: 10 out of 10 were "top 10 business newspapers" listicles from PR and marketing blogs. The Ken was not mentioned.

Question

"Is The Ken subscription worth it compared to The Morning Context?"

Answer: The Ken is "roughly ₹3.5k/year", TMC "about ₹2.5k/year", and The Ken is good for "Nutgraf".

What's wrong: both prices (The Ken is ₹3,245–4,956; TMC ₹2,999–3,481). The Nutgraf ended in September 2025, although The Ken's own pricing page still lists it among plan benefits, so part of the fix is on the-ken.com. Sources: four Reddit threads from 2019–2024, three Grapevine threads, a 2019 Entrackr article, a Similarweb page and one the-ken.com offer page.

The point

When The Ken isn't in the source pool, an AI engine still describes The Ken. It uses whatever is left: old forum threads, listicles and LinkedIn teasers. Blocking crawlers doesn't keep The Ken out of the answers. It only means The Ken has no say in what the answers contain.

4.3

Why: what robots.txt allows and blocks

From the-ken.com/robots.txt on 5 October 2026. The file also carries a Cloudflare content signal: search=yes, ai-train=no. The blocks below go further than that signal.

CrawlerWhat it's forStatusWhat blocking it means
GPTBot · ClaudeBot · CCBotTraining modelsBlockedConsistent with ai-train=no. Reasonable
OAI-SearchBot · PerplexityBotCiting pages in answersBlockedChatGPT search and Perplexity are asked not to fetch The Ken's pages, so they have little to cite, even a free preview
ChatGPT-UserFetching a page a user asked aboutBlockedAsks ChatGPT not to fetch a page a reader pastes in (OpenAI treats these fetches as user-initiated, so worth testing)
bingbotBing search indexBlockedLikely missing, or shown without a snippet, on Bing, and so on Copilot, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and the Bing results ChatGPT search draws on
ia_archiverInternet ArchiveBlockedHas little effect: the Wayback Machine still holds 2026 captures of the-ken.com
GooglebotGoogle Search, and AI Overviews and AI ModeAllowedGoogle can't be split: the same crawler feeds both search and AI Overviews
Google-Extended · Applebot-Extended · meta-externalagentTraining for Gemini, Apple and Llama (Bytespider is already refused with a 403 at Cloudflare)Not listedAllowed by default, which contradicts ai-train=no. If the goal is "no training", these are the gaps

Minor tidying: GPTBot is listed three times, and OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, CCBot, AhrefsBot, SemrushBot and MJ12bot twice each. There's no llms.txt (404), and while story pages carry NewsArticle markup, newsletter and podcast pages carry none (see Product audit).

The blocks are out of step with The Ken's own content signal (search=yes, ai-train=no). The most valuable AI traffic for a subscription publisher is a cited link in an answer: a reader with a question, at the moment they want depth. The least valuable is training, where the content is absorbed with no credit. The Ken currently blocks the citation crawlers from OpenAI and Perplexity while leaving Google, Apple and Meta free to train.
4.4

The trade-off, stated fairly

Blocking AI is a reasonable position, especially for a company running an event called Intelligence Independence. The case is for making the choice crawler by crawler, with data, instead of one block for everyone.

Option A

Keep everything blocked

Maximum protection. The Ken stays out of AI answers, and the AI's picture of The Ken keeps coming from Reddit and LinkedIn. That picture gets more out of date every month.

Option B · my suggestion

Block training, allow citing

Keep GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot blocked, and add Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and Meta. Allow OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot and Bing to see what Google already sees: the headline, the summary and the free preview. The paywall stays where it is. Answers start linking to The Ken.

Option C

License

OpenAI is reportedly paying Times of India and ET about $5M a year and Indian Express about $3M a year (Sep 2026). A small publisher won't get a deal it can't price. A measured record of how often The Ken would be cited is the evidence for one.

The legal backdrop makes blocking weaker leverage than it looks. In July 2026 the Delhi High Court refused ANI an interim injunction against OpenAI and held, at first view, that training is fair dealing. A government working paper from December 2025 proposes a compulsory blanket licence with no opt-out. If either becomes settled law, robots.txt protects less and visibility matters more.

4.5

The wider shift

The paywall protected The Ken from the traffic collapse that hit Indian news sites in 2025–26. The next shift is in where readers ask their questions.

Year-on-year traffic change, Indian news sites, early 2026

Similarweb via Press Gazette and Indian Printer & Publisher. The Ken isn't in these lists

India.com (Jan)−72%
Hindustan Times (Jan)−63%
Indian Express (Feb)−48%
News18 (Feb)−41%
Indiatimes (Apr)−8%
ChatGPT weekly users in India Reported
100M
Feb 2026, per Sam Altman
Airtel customers offered free Perplexity Pro Reported
~360M
From Jul 2025
Indians using chatbots for news weekly Reported
18%
Reuters Digital News Report 2025, online sample
Paid digital news subscriptions in India Reported
~4M
FICCI-EY 2026. Moneycontrol and Mint hold about 40% of them
4.6

What I'd do, within The Ken's AI policy

The policy says AI won't write stories. None of these needs it to. Each uses AI to measure, find or route, and keeps human-written words as the only output.

Measure

An answer-engine panel

About 200 questions drawn from The Ken's beats and brand, asked weekly on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode and Claude. Track whether The Ken is cited, who is cited instead, and what the engines say about price and products. This is what Vedlora does, with confidence intervals so a change is a real change.

Decide

A crawler-by-crawler policy

Run Option B on a sample of free pages for 60 days and measure citations, referral visits and sign-ups from AI engines. Then decide with evidence. It's reversible with a one-line change.

Correct

Give the engines something true to say

An llms.txt, the NewsArticle and paywall markup that story pages already have extended to newsletters and podcasts, and an up-to-date public page per product (plans, prices, newsletters, podcasts). Then answers stop quoting a ₹3.5k price and a newsletter that no longer exists.

Find

Search that respects the policy

The new semantic search is good at topics. In my test it missed time ("before Covid" returned mostly stories from early in the pandemic, plus one from 2022). Add a query-understanding step for dates, authors and companies, and return the reporter's own paragraphs with links: retrieval only, nothing generated. See Product audit.